Trueline Mcp
Repository: trueline-mcp
Author: rjkaes · Source status: Clear source
Score 82Clear source
Manual reviewSmarter reads, safer edits.
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Author unclaimed
Universal
12
Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
use-mcp
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
mcp-for-beginners
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
splitrail
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | use-mcp | mcp-for-beginners | splitrail |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Audit grade | C · Review first | C · Review first | C · Review first |
Execution risk | High | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command |
Evidence confidence | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | modelcontextprotocol/use-mcp | microsoft/mcp-for-beginners | Piebald-AI/splitrail |
Category | Dev & Engineering | Dev & Engineering | Dev & Engineering |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & trust | |||
Trust score | 67 | 85 | 82 |
Audit signals | No explicit signals | No explicit signals | needs credentials |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Universal | Universal | Universal |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 1K | 15.8K | 150 |
Repository: opencode-glm-quota
Author: guyinwonder168 · Source status: Clear source
Opencode plugin to query Z.ai GLM Coding Plan usage statistics with real-time quota monitoring, model usage tracking, and MCP Tools usage Topics: ci-cd, github-actions, glm, opencode, plugin, quota-monitoring, typescript
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Repository: entroly
Author: juyterman1000 · Source status: Clear source
Entroly helps AI coding tools like Cursor, Copilot, and Claude Code use the right context from your entire codebase—improving output quality while reducing token usage.
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
2026-01-13 |
2026-04-08 |
2026-04-06 |
Permission hints |
|---|
repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
local runtime dependencies, repository clone |
40 |
40 |
55 |