Unifai
Repository: UnifAI
Author: redhat-community-ai-tools · Source status: Clear source
Production-grade multi-agent orchestration engine.
Score basis:Clear source · High risk signals · Universal
Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Selected skills (2/4)
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
scholar-rag
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps:missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
serena
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps:missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | scholar-rag | serena |
|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | ||
Audit grade | C · Review first | C · Review first |
Execution risk | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence confidence | 67% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | ||
Provenance | PangHu1020/scholar-rag | oraios/serena |
Category | Knowledge & RAG | Knowledge & RAG |
Freshness | 2026-04-06 | 2026-04-08 |
| Risk & trust | ||
Trust score | 82 | 79 |
Audit signals | No explicit signals | No explicit signals |
Permission hints | ||
| Install & compatibility | ||
Supported tools | Universal | Universal |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | ||
| Community | ||
Stars | 22 | 22.6K |
Repository: OpenViking
Author: volcengine · Source status: Clear source
OpenViking is an open-source context database designed specifically for AI Agents(such as openclaw).
Score basis:Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Repository: generative-ai-for-beginners-project-based-guide-to-building-rag-agents
Author: hereandnowai · Source status: Clear source
A beginner-friendly, project-driven tutorial on generative AI and LangChain agents.
Score basis:Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Repository: Buddy
Author: is-leeroy-jenkins · Source status: Clear source
An AI for federal financial management designed to support Financial Analysts, Managers, and Policy Professionals.
Score basis:Clear source · High risk signals · Universal
Repository: AI-QA-Retrieval-Assistant-API
Author: mvsaran · Source status: Clear source
A complete, end-to-end **Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)** API server built with **Python**, **FastAPI**, **LangChain**, and **ChromaDB**.
Score basis:Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Repository: rag_demos
Author: dappros · Source status: Clear source
Examples of RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) with Ethora, LangChain, and OpenAI.
Score basis:Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
40 |