Mcp Sequentialthinking Tools
Repository: mcp-sequentialthinking-tools
Author: spences10 · Source status: Clear source
🧠 An adaptation of the MCP Sequential Thinking Server to guide tool usage.
Score basis:Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Selected skills (2/4)
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: mcp-sequentialthinking-tools
Author: spences10 · Source status: Clear source
🧠 An adaptation of the MCP Sequential Thinking Server to guide tool usage.
Score basis:Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
responsible-prompting-api
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution
Control gaps:missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
Create-MCP
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps:missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | responsible-prompting-api | Create-MCP |
|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | ||
Audit grade | C · Review first | C · Review first |
Execution risk | High | High |
Threat tags | prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence confidence | 67% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | ||
Provenance | IBM/responsible-prompting-api | AnnieBabs/Create-MCP |
Category | Integrations & Connectors | Integrations & Connectors |
Freshness | 2026-01-27 | |
| Risk & trust | ||
Trust score | 73 | 82 |
Audit signals | No explicit signals | No explicit signals |
Permission hints | ||
| Install & compatibility | ||
Supported tools | Universal | Universal |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | ||
| Community | ||
Stars | 46 | 5 |
Repository: indonesia-gov-apis
Author: suryast · Source status: Clear source
🇮🇩 50+ Indonesian Government APIs & Data Sources — BPS, OJK, BPJPH, BPOM, Bank Indonesia, IDX, BMKG + MCP servers.
Score basis:Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Repository: cloud-pak-deployer
Author: IBM · Source status: Clear source
Configuration-based installation of OpenShift and Cloud Pak for Data/Integration/Watson AIOps/Business Automation on various private and public cloud infrastructure providers.
Score basis:Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Repository: openclaw-telemetry
Author: knostic · Source status: Clear source
Telemetry for OpenClaw - Captures tool calls, LLM usage, agent lifecycle, and message events.
Score basis:Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
40 |