Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Selected skills (2/4)
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
Rentahuman
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
Graveyard Protocol CLI
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | Rentahuman | Graveyard Protocol CLI |
|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | ||
Audit grade | C · Review first | C · Review first |
Execution risk | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command |
Evidence confidence | 67% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | ||
Provenance | openclaw/skills | openclaw/skills |
Category | Dev & Engineering | Dev & Engineering |
Freshness | 2026-03-26 | |
| Risk & trust | ||
Trust score | 85 | 85 |
Audit signals | needs credentials, network access, runs shell, writes files | |
| Install & compatibility | ||
Supported tools | OpenClaw | OpenClaw |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | ||
| Community | ||
Stars | 0 | 0 |
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: nic-yuan · Source status: Clear source
Spec-first, TDD, subagent-driven software development workflow for OpenClaw agents.
Score basis：Clear source · High risk signals · OpenClaw
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: tenequm · Source status: Clear source
Convert documentation, GitHub repos, PDFs, codebases, videos, and more into structured AI skills using the skill-seekers CLI.
Score basis：Clear source · High risk signals · Claude
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: kongbai233 · Source status: Clear source
This skill should be used when the user needs to analyze Git repositories, compare developer commit patterns, work habits, development efficiency, code style, code quality, and slacking behaviors.
Score basis：Clear source · High risk signals · Universal
Permission hints | verify source provenance before install | requires binary: node, requires binary: npx, requires binary: gp-cli, verify source provenance before install |
|---|
65 |
