Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
Promet
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
OpenTokenMonitor
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
splitrail
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | Promet | OpenTokenMonitor | splitrail |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Audit grade | C · Review first | C · Review first | C · Review first |
Execution risk | High | High | High |
Threat tags | prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command |
Evidence confidence | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | Tripadh/Promet | Hitheshkaranth/OpenTokenMonitor | Piebald-AI/splitrail |
Category | Dev & Engineering | Dev & Engineering | Dev & Engineering |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & trust | |||
Trust score | 82 | 82 | 82 |
Audit signals | |||
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Universal | Universal | Universal |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 4 | 9 | 150 |
Repository: Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor
Author: hoangsonww · Source status: Clear source
A real-time monitoring dashboard for Claude Code agents, built with SQLite3, Node.js, Express, React, Vite, TailwindCSS, and WebSockets.
Score basis：Clear source · High risk signals · Universal
Repository: rox
Author: BeWelcome · Source status: Clear source
:earth_africa: BeWelcome lets you share a place to stay, connect with travellers, meet up and find accommodation on your journey.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Repository: entroly
Author: juyterman1000 · Source status: Clear source
Entroly helps AI coding tools like Cursor, Copilot, and Claude Code use the right context from your entire codebase—improving output quality while reducing token usage.
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
2026-04-02 |
2026-03-28 |
2026-04-06 |
No explicit signals |
needs credentials |
needs credentials |
Permission hints | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | local runtime dependencies, repository clone |
|---|
40 |
55 |
55 |
