Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
openclaw-agent-feeds
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
Cheddar
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
Ukg Pro Hcm
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | openclaw-agent-feeds | Cheddar | Ukg Pro Hcm |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Audit grade | C · Review first | C · Review first | C · Review first |
Execution risk | High | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command |
Evidence confidence | 65% | 67% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | mkhsu2002/openclaw-agent-feeds | openclaw/skills | openclaw/skills |
Category | Dev & Engineering | Dev & Engineering | Dev & Engineering |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & trust | |||
Trust score | 76 | 82 | 82 |
Audit signals | |||
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Universal | Universal | Universal |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 93 | 0 | 0 |
Repository: mcp-for-beginners
Author: microsoft · Source status: Clear source
This open-source curriculum introduces the fundamentals of Model Context Protocol (MCP) through real-world, cross-language examples in .NET, Java, TypeScript, JavaScript, Rust and Python.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Repository: raptor
Author: gadievron · Source status: Clear source
Raptor turns Claude Code into a general-purpose AI offensive/defensive security agent.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Repository: tokscale
Author: junhoyeo · Source status: Clear source
🛰️ A CLI tool for tracking token usage from OpenCode, Claude Code, 🦞OpenClaw (Clawdbot/Moltbot), Pi, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, AmpCode, Factory Droid, Kimi, and more!
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
2026-04-01 |
2026-03-18 |
2026-03-12 |
needs credentials, network access, runs shell, writes files |
needs credentials, network access, runs shell, writes files |
Permission hints | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | verify source provenance before install | verify source provenance before install |
|---|
40 |
65 |
65 |
