Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
Score-basis diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: mcp-shark
Author: mcp-shark · Source status: Clear source
Wireshark-like forensic analysis for Model Context Protocol communications Capture, inspect, and investigate all HTTP requests and responses between your IDE and MCP servers Topics: electron, forensic-analysis, forensic
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
Observal
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
skill-seekers
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
langfuse
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | Observal | skill-seekers | langfuse |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-install decision | |||
Pre-install score | 79 · Manual review | 88 · Evidence missing | 79 · Manual review |
Score basis | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal | Clear source, High execution risk, Claude | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal |
Execution risk | High | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence completeness | 65% | 71% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | BlazeUp-AI/Observal | openclaw/skills | langfuse/langfuse |
Category | Operations & Infra | Dev & Engineering | Operations & Infra |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & permission signals | |||
Audit signals | No explicit signals | needs credentials, network access, runs shell, writes files | No explicit signals |
Permission hints | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | verify source provenance before install | repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Universal | Claude, Cursor, Windsurf | Universal |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 136 | 0 | 24.4K |
Repository: centreon
Author: centreon · Source status: Clear source
Centreon is a network, system and application monitoring tool.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
Repository: openclaw-office
Author: WW-AI-Lab · Source status: Clear source
OpenClaw Office is the visual monitoring and management frontend for the OpenClaw Multi-Agent system.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
Repository: httptap
Author: ozeranskii · Source status: Clear source
Rich-powered CLI that breaks each HTTP request into DNS, connect, TLS, wait, and transfer phases with waterfall timelines, compact summaries, or metrics-only output.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
Repository: MCP-PostgreSQL-Ops
Author: call518 · Source status: Clear source
🔍Professional MCP server for PostgreSQL operations & monitoring: 30+ extension-independent tools for performance analysis, table bloat detection, autovacuum monitoring, schema introspection, and database management.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
2026-04-05 |
2026-04-04 |
2026-04-06 |
40 |
65 |
40 |
