Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
O-RAN-Testbed-Automation
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
innoshop
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
build-tools-for-vmware-aria
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | O-RAN-Testbed-Automation | innoshop | build-tools-for-vmware-aria |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Audit grade | C · Review first | C · Review first | C · Review first |
Execution risk | High | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence confidence | 65% | 65% | 65% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | usnistgov/O-RAN-Testbed-Automation | innocommerce/innoshop | vmware/build-tools-for-vmware-aria |
Category | Operations & Infra | Operations & Infra | Operations & Infra |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & trust | |||
Trust score | 72 | 81 | 81 |
Audit signals | |||
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Universal | Universal | Universal |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 51 | 609 | 60 |
Repository: ARIAC
Author: usnistgov · Source status: Clear source
Repository for ARIAC (Agile Robotics for Industrial Automation Competition), consisting of kit building and assembly in a simulated warehouse
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Repository: mcp-for-argocd
Author: argoproj-labs · Source status: Clear source
An implementation of Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Argo CD.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
2026-04-07 |
2026-04-06 |
2026-04-06 |
No explicit signals |
No explicit signals |
Permission hints | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
|---|
40 |
40 |
40 |
