Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Selected skills (2/4)
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: Instagram-Hashtag-Scraper
Author: youmeat6678 · Source status: Clear source
A Python project for scraping Instagram posts based on specific hashtags.
Score basis：Clear source · High risk signals · Universal
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
mcp-perf-suite
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
Icebreaker Openers. 破冰。Rompehielos.
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | mcp-perf-suite | Icebreaker Openers. 破冰。Rompehielos. |
|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | ||
Audit grade | C · Review first | D · Limited evidence |
Execution risk | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command |
Evidence confidence | 67% | 69% |
| Source & provenance | ||
Provenance | canyonlabz/mcp-perf-suite | openclaw/skills |
Category | Web & Automation | Integrations & Connectors |
Freshness | 2026-04-06 | 2026-04-01 |
| Risk & trust | ||
Trust score | 81 | 85 |
Audit signals | No explicit signals | needs credentials, network access, runs shell, writes files |
Permission hints | ||
| Install & compatibility | ||
Supported tools | Universal | Claude, OpenClaw |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | 40 | |
| Community | ||
Stars | 3 | 0 |
Repository: UI-TARS-desktop
Author: bytedance · Source status: Clear source
The Open-Source Multimodal AI Agent Stack: Connecting Cutting-Edge AI Models and Agent Infra Topics: agent, agent-tars, browser-use, computer-use, cowork, gui-agent, gui-operator, mcp, mcp-server, multimodal, tars, ui-ta
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
verify source provenance before install |
65 |
