Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Open notes
Suggested baseline
Suggested skills to compare
Convert documentation, GitHub repos, PDFs, codebases, videos, and more into structured AI skills using the skill-seekers CLI. Use this skill whenever the user wants to create an AI
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: tenequm · Source status: Clear source
Score 57Clear source
Evidence missing
Convert documentation, GitHub repos, PDFs, codebases, videos, and more into structured AI skills using the skill-seekers CLI.
Score basis:Clear source · High execution risk · Claude · Evidence completeness 71%
Author unclaimed
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
mcp-integration
C · Review first
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:data exfiltration, memory context poisoning, human approval gap
Control gaps:missing license, broad permissions, network without allowlist
claude-code-security-review
C · Review first
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps:missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
docker-selenium
C · Review first
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps:missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
Dimension
mcp-integration
claude-code-security-review
docker-selenium
Pre-install decision
Pre-install score
72 · Manual review
66 · Manual review
65 · Manual review
Score basis
Clear source, High execution risk, Claude
Clear source, High execution risk, Universal
Clear source, High execution risk, Universal
Execution risk
High
High
High
Threat tags
data exfiltration, memory context poisoning, human approval gap
unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps
missing license, broad permissions, network without allowlist
missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails