Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
Score-basis diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: claude-token-tracker
Author: pepperonas · Source status: Clear source
Token usage dashboard for Claude Code — tracks costs, sessions, models, and tools with real-time updates Topics: achievements, anthropic, chart-js, claude, claude-code, cost-estimation, dashboard, github-auth, multi-user
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
Locale
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
splitrail
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
database-migration
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | Locale | splitrail | database-migration |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-install decision | |||
Pre-install score | 81 · Manual review | 82 · Manual review | 82 · Manual review |
Score basis | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal | Clear source, High execution risk, Claude |
Execution risk | High | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence completeness | 65% | 67% | 65% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | Taiizor/Locale | Piebald-AI/splitrail | wshobson/agents |
Category | Data & Analytics | Dev & Engineering | Data & Analytics |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & permission signals | |||
Audit signals | runs shell, writes files | needs credentials | runs shell |
Permission hints | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | local runtime dependencies, repository clone | local skill installation, workspace file updates |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Universal | Universal | Claude, Codex, Cursor, Windsurf |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed | instruction-only |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 10 | 150 | 33.2K |
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: zwd0313 · Source status: Clear source
Run Claude Code tasks in headless mode with `claude -p` through the local `cc-task-runner.sh` wrapper, including model switching, JSON output capture, structured schema checks, multi-file artifact validation, and glob ma
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Claude · Evidence completeness 65%
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: yogurtliu · Source status: Clear source
Automatically convert GPS coordinates in FIT files from GCJ-02 to WGS-84 format and optionally upload to Strava.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · OpenClaw · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: openai/skills
Author: openai · Source status: Clear source
Analyze git repositories to build a security ownership topology (people-to-file), compute bus factor and sensitive-code ownership, and export CSV/JSON for graph databases and visualization.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Claude · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: aipoch-ai · Source status: Clear source
Analyze data with `smiles-de-salter` using a reproducible workflow, explicit validation, and structured outputs for review-ready interpretation.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · OpenClaw · Evidence completeness 67%
2026-04-01 |
2026-04-06 |
2026-04-09 |
50 |
55 |
70 |
