Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
Score-basis diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: claude-token-tracker
Author: pepperonas · Source status: Clear source
Token usage dashboard for Claude Code — tracks costs, sessions, models, and tools with real-time updates Topics: achievements, anthropic, chart-js, claude, claude-code, cost-estimation, dashboard, github-auth, multi-user
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
Locale
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
Claude Task Runner
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
Aliyun Qwen Multimodal Embedding
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | Locale | Claude Task Runner | Aliyun Qwen Multimodal Embedding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-install decision | |||
Pre-install score | 81 · Manual review | 85 · Manual review | 85 · Evidence missing |
Score basis | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal | Clear source, High execution risk, Claude | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal |
Execution risk | High | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command |
Evidence completeness | 65% | 65% | 69% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | Taiizor/Locale | openclaw/skills | openclaw/skills |
Category | Data & Analytics | Data & Analytics | Knowledge & RAG |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & permission signals | |||
Audit signals | runs shell, writes files | network access, runs shell, writes files | needs credentials, network access, runs shell, writes files |
Permission hints | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | verify source provenance before install | verify source provenance before install |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Universal | Claude, OpenClaw | Universal |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Repository: agents
Author: wshobson · Source status: Clear source
Database Migration skill from wshobson/agents.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Claude · Evidence completeness 65%
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: yogurtliu · Source status: Clear source
Automatically convert GPS coordinates in FIT files from GCJ-02 to WGS-84 format and optionally upload to Strava.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · OpenClaw · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: openai/skills
Author: openai · Source status: Clear source
Analyze git repositories to build a security ownership topology (people-to-file), compute bus factor and sensitive-code ownership, and export CSV/JSON for graph databases and visualization.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Claude · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: aipoch-ai · Source status: Clear source
Analyze data with `smiles-de-salter` using a reproducible workflow, explicit validation, and structured outputs for review-ready interpretation.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · OpenClaw · Evidence completeness 67%
2026-03-29 |
2026-04-02 |
50 |
50 |
65 |
