Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Selected skills (2/4)
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: ARIAC
Author: usnistgov · Source status: Clear source
Repository for ARIAC (Agile Robotics for Industrial Automation Competition), consisting of kit building and assembly in a simulated warehouse
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
labbench
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
mcp-for-beginners
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | labbench | mcp-for-beginners |
|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | ||
Audit grade | C · Review first | C · Review first |
Execution risk | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence confidence | 65% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | ||
Provenance | usnistgov/labbench | microsoft/mcp-for-beginners |
Category | Dev & Engineering | Dev & Engineering |
Freshness | 2026-03-18 | |
| Risk & trust | ||
Trust score | 70 | 85 |
Audit signals | No explicit signals | No explicit signals |
Permission hints | ||
| Install & compatibility | ||
Supported tools | Universal | Universal |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | ||
| Community | ||
Stars | 23 | 15.8K |
Repository: claude-ide-tools
Author: YousifAshwal · Source status: Clear source
🛠️ Enhance Claude Code CLI’s refactoring with JetBrains IDEs, leveraging advanced semantic analysis for smarter code usage handling.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Repository: posthog
Author: PostHog · Source status: Clear source
🦔 PostHog is an all-in-one developer platform for building successful products.
Score basis：Clear source · High risk signals · Universal
Repository: Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor
Author: hoangsonww · Source status: Clear source
A real-time monitoring dashboard for Claude Code agents, built with SQLite3, Node.js, Express, React, Vite, TailwindCSS, and WebSockets.
Score basis：Clear source · High risk signals · Universal
Repository: raptor
Author: gadievron · Source status: Clear source
Raptor turns Claude Code into a general-purpose AI offensive/defensive security agent.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
40 |
