Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Selected skills (2/4)
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
gptree-gui
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
raptor
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | gptree-gui | raptor |
|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | ||
Audit grade | C · Review first | C · Review first |
Execution risk | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning | prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence confidence | 67% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | ||
Provenance | travisvn/gptree-gui | gadievron/raptor |
Category | Dev & Engineering | Dev & Engineering |
Freshness | 2025-07-18 | 2026-04-08 |
| Risk & trust | ||
Trust score | 67 | 82 |
Audit signals | writes files | No explicit signals |
Permission hints | ||
| Install & compatibility | ||
Supported tools | Universal | Universal |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | ||
| Community | ||
Stars | 31 | 1.9K |
Repository: claude-pace-maker
Author: LightspeedDMS · Source status: Clear source
Prevent Claude Code overages by throttling tool usage when getting close to the 5-hour limit and weekly limit.
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Repository: ccNexus
Author: lich0821 · Source status: Clear source
Intelligent API gateway for Claude Code and Codex CLI - rotate endpoints, monitor usage, and seamlessly integrate OpenAI, Gemini, and other platforms.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Repository: entroly
Author: juyterman1000 · Source status: Clear source
Entroly helps AI coding tools like Cursor, Copilot, and Claude Code use the right context from your entire codebase—improving output quality while reducing token usage.
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Repository: tool_calling_api
Author: Shuyib · Source status: Clear source
This project demonstrates function-calling with Python and Ollama, utilizing the Africa's Talking API to send airtime and messages to phone numbers using natural language prompts.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
40 |
