Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
free_chatgpt_api
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
splitrail
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
GPT_API_free
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | free_chatgpt_api | splitrail | GPT_API_free |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Audit grade | C · Review first | C · Review first | C · Review first |
Execution risk | High | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command |
Evidence confidence | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | popjane/free_chatgpt_api | Piebald-AI/splitrail | chatanywhere/GPT_API_free |
Category | Automation & Workflows | Dev & Engineering | Automation & Workflows |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & trust | |||
Trust score | 92 | 82 | 92 |
Audit signals | |||
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Universal | Universal | Universal |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 6.3K | 150 | 37.3K |
Repository: one-api
Author: songquanpeng · Source status: Clear source
LLM API 管理 & 分发系统，支持 OpenAI、Azure、Anthropic Claude、Google Gemini、DeepSeek、字节豆包、ChatGLM、文心一言、讯飞星火、通义千问、360 智脑、腾讯混元等主流模型，统一 API 适配，可用于 key 管理与二次分发。单可执行文件，提供 Docker 镜像，一键部署，开箱即用。LLM API management & key redistribution syst…
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
2025-11-28 |
2026-04-06 |
2026-04-13 |
needs credentials |
metadata-only |
Permission hints | repository clone | local runtime dependencies, repository clone | repository clone |
|---|
75 |
55 |
75 |
