Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
Score-basis diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
graphrag
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
CLIP
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
budibase
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | graphrag | CLIP | budibase |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-install decision | |||
Pre-install score | 65 · Manual review | 66 · Manual review | 66 · Manual review |
Score basis | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal |
Execution risk | High | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence completeness | 67% | 65% | 65% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | microsoft/graphrag | openai/CLIP | Budibase/budibase |
Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows | Agent & Tools |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & permission signals | |||
Audit signals | metadata-only | metadata-only | metadata-only |
Permission hints | repository clone | repository clone | repository clone |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Universal | Universal | Universal |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 32.2K | 33.2K | 27.8K |
Repository: semantic-kernel
Author: microsoft · Source status: Clear source
Integrate cutting-edge LLM technology quickly and easily into your apps
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: RAG_Techniques
Author: NirDiamant · Source status: Clear source
This repository showcases various advanced techniques for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: LightRAG
Author: HKUDS · Source status: Clear source
[EMNLP2025] "LightRAG: Simple and Fast Retrieval-Augmented Generation"
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: FastGPT
Author: labring · Source status: Clear source
FastGPT is a knowledge-based platform built on the LLMs, offers a comprehensive suite of out-of-the-box capabilities such as data processing, RAG retrieval, and visual AI workflow orchestration, letting you easily devel…
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
2026-04-14 |
2026-03-26 |
2026-04-14 |
75 |
75 |
75 |
