Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
Score-basis diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
BitNet
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
airflow
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：broad permissions, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist
Graveyard Protocol CLI
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | BitNet | airflow | Graveyard Protocol CLI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-install decision | |||
Pre-install score | 66 · Manual review | 67 · Manual review | 60 · Manual review |
Score basis | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal | Clear source, High execution risk, OpenClaw |
Execution risk | High | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | broad permissions, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command |
Evidence completeness | 65% | 65% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | microsoft/BitNet | apache/airflow | openclaw/skills |
Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows | Dev & Engineering |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & permission signals | |||
Audit signals | metadata-only | metadata-only | needs credentials, network access, runs shell, writes files |
Permission hints | repository clone | repository clone | requires binary: node, requires binary: npx, requires binary: gp-cli, verify source provenance before install |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Universal | Universal | OpenClaw |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 38.2K | 45K | 0 |
Repository: graphrag
Author: microsoft · Source status: Clear source
A modular graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: semantic-kernel
Author: microsoft · Source status: Clear source
Integrate cutting-edge LLM technology quickly and easily into your apps
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: vllm
Author: vllm-project · Source status: Clear source
A high-throughput and memory-efficient inference and serving engine for LLMs
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: ai-agents-for-beginners
Author: microsoft · Source status: Clear source
12 Lessons to Get Started Building AI Agents
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
2026-03-10 |
2026-04-14 |
2026-03-31 |
75 |
75 |
65 |
