Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
Score-basis diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: agency-agents
Author: msitarzewski · Source status: Clear source
A complete AI agency at your fingertips - From frontend wizards to Reddit community ninjas, from whimsy injectors to reality checkers.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
accessibility-scanner
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
mcp-integration
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：data exfiltration, memory context poisoning, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, network without allowlist
LightRAG
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | accessibility-scanner | mcp-integration | LightRAG |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-install decision | |||
Pre-install score | 90 · Manual review | 79 · Manual review | 92 · Manual review |
Score basis | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal | Clear source, High execution risk, Claude | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal |
Execution risk | High | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | data exfiltration, memory context poisoning, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, network without allowlist | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence completeness | 65% | 65% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | github/accessibility-scanner | anthropics/claude-code/tree/main/plugins/plugin-dev/skills/mcp-integration | HKUDS/LightRAG |
Category | Agent & Tools | Operations & Infra | Automation & Workflows |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & permission signals | |||
Audit signals | metadata-only | network access | metadata-only |
Permission hints | repository clone | registry access, remote metadata pull, runtime dependencies may be required | repository clone |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Universal | Claude, Codex, Cursor, Universal | Universal |
Install method | script-backed | registry-install | script-backed |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 260 | 65.5K | 33.2K |
Repository: lobehub
Author: lobehub · Source status: Clear source
The ultimate space for work and life — to find, build, and collaborate with agent teammates that grow with you.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
Repository: ansible
Author: ansible · Source status: Clear source
Ansible is a radically simple IT automation platform that makes your applications and systems easier to deploy and maintain.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
Repository: cline
Author: cline · Source status: Clear source
Autonomous coding agent right in your IDE, capable of creating/editing files, executing commands, using the browser, and more with your permission every step of the way.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: cherry-studio
Author: CherryHQ · Source status: Clear source
AI productivity studio with smart chat, autonomous agents, and 300+ assistants.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
Repository: Open-Assistant
Author: LAION-AI · Source status: Clear source
OpenAssistant is a chat-based assistant that understands tasks, can interact with third-party systems, and retrieve information dynamically to do so.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
2026-04-14 |
2026-02-04 |
2026-04-13 |
75 |
50 |
75 |
