Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: claude-ide-tools
Author: YousifAshwal · Source status: Clear source
🛠️ Enhance Claude Code CLI’s refactoring with JetBrains IDEs, leveraging advanced semantic analysis for smarter code usage handling.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
github-for-jira
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
rox
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
claude-code-env-manager
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | github-for-jira | rox | claude-code-env-manager |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Audit grade | C · Review first | C · Review first | C · Review first |
Execution risk | High | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command |
Evidence confidence | 65% | 65% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | atlassian/github-for-jira | BeWelcome/rox | Genuifx/claude-code-env-manager |
Category | Dev & Engineering | Dev & Engineering | Dev & Engineering |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & trust | |||
Trust score | 71 | 82 | 82 |
Audit signals | |||
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Universal | Universal | Universal |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 654 | 210 | 15 |
Repository: splitrail
Author: Piebald-AI · Source status: Clear source
Fast, cross-platform, real-time token usage tracker and cost monitor for Gemini CLI / Claude Code / Codex CLI / Qwen Code / Cline / Roo Code / Kilo Code / GitHub Copilot / OpenCode / Pi Agent / Piebald.
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Repository: opencode-glm-quota
Author: guyinwonder168 · Source status: Clear source
Opencode plugin to query Z.ai GLM Coding Plan usage statistics with real-time quota monitoring, model usage tracking, and MCP Tools usage Topics: ci-cd, github-actions, glm, opencode, plugin, quota-monitoring, typescript
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
2026-01-28 |
2026-03-30 |
2026-04-06 |
No explicit signals |
No explicit signals |
Permission hints | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
|---|
40 |
40 |
40 |
