Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
Score-basis diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: openai/skills
Author: openai · Source status: Clear source
Analyze git repositories to build a security ownership topology (people-to-file), compute bus factor and sensitive-code ownership, and export CSV/JSON for graph databases and visualization.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Claude · Evidence completeness 67%
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
git-commit
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
langfuse-python
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
oss-llmops-stack
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | git-commit | langfuse-python | oss-llmops-stack |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-install decision | |||
Pre-install score | 79 · Manual review | 92 · Manual review | 83 · Manual review |
Score basis | Clear source, High execution risk, Claude | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal |
Execution risk | High | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence completeness | 65% | 65% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | github/awesome-copilot/tree/main/skills/git-commit | langfuse/langfuse-python | langfuse/oss-llmops-stack |
Category | Operations & Infra | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & permission signals | |||
Audit signals | runs shell, writes files | metadata-only | metadata-only |
Permission hints | registry access, remote metadata pull, runtime dependencies may be required | repository clone | repository clone |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Claude, Codex, Cursor, Universal | Universal | Universal |
Install method | registry-install | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 20.6K | 378 | 136 |
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: landoyjx · Source status: Clear source
Automatically execute tasks from checklist.md with state management and scheduled checking
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Claude · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: tenequm · Source status: Clear source
Convert documentation, GitHub repos, PDFs, codebases, videos, and more into structured AI skills using the skill-seekers CLI.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Claude · Evidence completeness 71%
Repository: accessibility-scanner
Author: github · Source status: Clear source
Finds potential accessibility gaps, files GitHub issues to track them, and attempts to fix them with Copilot.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
2026-02-04 |
2026-04-13 |
2025-02-16 |
60 |
75 |
75 |
