Kubeshark
Repository: kubeshark
Author: kubeshark · Source status: Clear source
eBPF-powered network observability for Kubernetes.
Score basis:Clear source · High risk signals · Universal
Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Selected skills (2/4)
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
devopness
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution
Control gaps:missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
mcp-for-argocd
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps:missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | devopness | mcp-for-argocd |
|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | ||
Audit grade | C · Review first | C · Review first |
Execution risk | High | High |
Threat tags | prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence confidence | 67% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | ||
Provenance | devopness/devopness | argoproj-labs/mcp-for-argocd |
Category | Operations & Infra | Operations & Infra |
Freshness | 2026-04-08 | |
| Risk & trust | ||
Trust score | 79 | 79 |
Audit signals | No explicit signals | |
| Install & compatibility | ||
Supported tools | Universal | Universal |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | ||
| Community | ||
Stars | 367 | 392 |
Repository: coolify-mcp
Author: StuMason · Source status: Clear source
MCP server for Coolify — 38 optimized tools for managing self-hosted PaaS through AI assistants Topics: ai, claude, coolify, deployment, devops, infrastructure, mcp, model-context-protocol, paas, self-hosted, typescript.
Score basis:Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Repository: env-doctor
Author: mitulgarg · Source status: Clear source
Diagnose and Fix CUDA / GPU environments compatibility issues locally, in Docker, and CI/CD.
Score basis:Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Permission hints | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
|---|
40 |