Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
Score-basis diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
devopness
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
vllm
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
codex
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | devopness | vllm | codex |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-install decision | |||
Pre-install score | 63 · Manual review | 65 · Manual review | 66 · Manual review |
Score basis | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal |
Execution risk | High | High | High |
Threat tags | prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence completeness | 67% | 67% | 65% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | devopness/devopness | vllm-project/vllm | openai/codex |
Category | Operations & Infra | Automation & Workflows | Agent & Tools |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & permission signals | |||
Audit signals | No explicit signals | metadata-only | metadata-only |
Permission hints | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | repository clone | repository clone |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Universal | Universal | Universal |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 367 | 76.5K | 75.1K |
Repository: mcp-for-argocd
Author: argoproj-labs · Source status: Clear source
An implementation of Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Argo CD.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: skillhub
Author: iflytek · Source status: Clear source
Self-hosted, open-source agent skill registry for enterprises.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: coolify-mcp
Author: StuMason · Source status: Clear source
MCP server for Coolify — 38 optimized tools for managing self-hosted PaaS through AI assistants Topics: ai, claude, coolify, deployment, devops, infrastructure, mcp, model-context-protocol, paas, self-hosted, typescript.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: env-doctor
Author: mitulgarg · Source status: Clear source
Diagnose and Fix CUDA / GPU environments compatibility issues locally, in Docker, and CI/CD.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
2026-04-08 |
2026-04-14 |
2026-04-14 |
40 |
75 |
75 |
