Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: soponcd · Source status: Clear source
Refactor and review SwiftUI view files for consistent structure, dependency injection, and Observation usage.
Score basis：Clear source · High risk signals · Universal
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
compose-for-agents
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
skill-seekers
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
Graveyard Protocol CLI
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | compose-for-agents | skill-seekers | Graveyard Protocol CLI |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Audit grade | C · Review first | D · Limited evidence | C · Review first |
Execution risk | High | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command |
Evidence confidence | 65% | 71% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | docker/compose-for-agents | openclaw/skills | openclaw/skills |
Category | Dev & Engineering | Dev & Engineering | Dev & Engineering |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & trust | |||
Trust score | 82 | 88 | 85 |
Audit signals | No explicit signals | needs credentials, network access, runs shell, writes files | needs credentials, network access, runs shell, writes files |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Universal | Claude, Cursor, Windsurf | OpenClaw |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 905 | 0 | 0 |
Repository: mcp-for-beginners
Author: microsoft · Source status: Clear source
This open-source curriculum introduces the fundamentals of Model Context Protocol (MCP) through real-world, cross-language examples in .NET, Java, TypeScript, JavaScript, Rust and Python.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Repository: rox
Author: BeWelcome · Source status: Clear source
:earth_africa: BeWelcome lets you share a place to stay, connect with travellers, meet up and find accommodation on your journey.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Repository: agentic-ai-engineering
Author: agenticloops-ai · Source status: Clear source
Hands-on tutorials for building AI agents from scratch.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Repository: ultimate-prompt-engineering-playbook
Author: amerob · Source status: Clear source
A collection of 114 notebooks covering modern prompt engineering techniques.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
2026-03-24 |
2026-04-04 |
2026-03-31 |
Permission hints |
|---|
repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
verify source provenance before install |
requires binary: node, requires binary: npx, requires binary: gp-cli, verify source provenance before install |
40 |
65 |
65 |
