Trueline Mcp
Repository: trueline-mcp
Author: rjkaes · Source status: Clear source
Smarter reads, safer edits.
Score basis:Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Selected skills (2/4)
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
codex-1up
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps:missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
tokscale
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps:missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | codex-1up | tokscale |
|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | ||
Audit grade | C · Review first | C · Review first |
Execution risk | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command |
Evidence confidence | 65% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | ||
Provenance | regenrek/codex-1up | junhoyeo/tokscale |
Category | Dev & Engineering | Dev & Engineering |
Freshness | 2026-02-20 | 2026-04-07 |
| Risk & trust | ||
Trust score | 67 | 82 |
Audit signals | No explicit signals | needs credentials |
Permission hints | ||
| Install & compatibility | ||
Supported tools | Universal | Universal |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | ||
| Community | ||
Stars | 424 | 1.6K |
Repository: inkbox
Author: inkbox-ai · Source status: Clear source
SDK, skills, and examples for Inkbox: give your AI agents identities, inboxes, phone numbers, and encrypted vaults.
Score basis:Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Repository: ccNexus
Author: lich0821 · Source status: Clear source
Intelligent API gateway for Claude Code and Codex CLI - rotate endpoints, monitor usage, and seamlessly integrate OpenAI, Gemini, and other platforms.
Score basis:Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
55 |