Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
Score-basis diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: keyikoi · Source status: Clear source
Embed interactive flight price trend charts into AI responses.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · OpenClaw · Evidence completeness 67%
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
claude-token-tracker
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
skill-seekers
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
database-migration
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | claude-token-tracker | skill-seekers | database-migration |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-install decision | |||
Pre-install score | 82 · Manual review | 88 · Evidence missing | 82 · Manual review |
Score basis | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal | Clear source, High execution risk, Claude | Clear source, High execution risk, Claude |
Execution risk | High | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence completeness | 67% | 71% | 65% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | pepperonas/claude-token-tracker | openclaw/skills | wshobson/agents |
Category | Data & Analytics | Dev & Engineering | Data & Analytics |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & permission signals | |||
Audit signals | needs credentials | needs credentials, network access, runs shell, writes files | runs shell |
Permission hints | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | verify source provenance before install | local skill installation, workspace file updates |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Universal | Claude, Cursor, Windsurf | Claude, Codex, Cursor, Windsurf |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed | instruction-only |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 4 | 0 | 33.2K |
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: zwd0313 · Source status: Clear source
Run Claude Code tasks in headless mode with `claude -p` through the local `cc-task-runner.sh` wrapper, including model switching, JSON output capture, structured schema checks, multi-file artifact validation, and glob ma
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Claude · Evidence completeness 65%
Repository: research-workflow-assistant
Author: andre-inter-collab-llc · Source status: Clear source
Open-source AI research assistant for VS Code + GitHub Copilot.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
2026-04-06 |
2026-04-04 |
2026-04-09 |
55 |
65 |
70 |
