Trueline Mcp
Repository: trueline-mcp
Author: rjkaes · Source status: Clear source
Smarter reads, safer edits.
Score basis:Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Selected skills (2/4)
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
chatai-plugin
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps:missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
opencode-glm-quota
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps:missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | chatai-plugin | opencode-glm-quota |
|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | ||
Audit grade | C · Review first | C · Review first |
Execution risk | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence confidence | 65% | 65% |
| Source & provenance | ||
Provenance | XxxXTeam/chatai-plugin | guyinwonder168/opencode-glm-quota |
Category | Dev & Engineering | Dev & Engineering |
Freshness | 2026-03-27 | |
| Risk & trust | ||
Trust score | 72 | 82 |
Audit signals | No explicit signals | No explicit signals |
Permission hints | ||
| Install & compatibility | ||
Supported tools | Universal | Universal |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | ||
| Community | ||
Stars | 20 | 12 |
Repository: codex-proxy
Author: XxxXTeam · Source status: Clear source
Codex API 代理服务,提供 OpenAI / Claude 多协议兼容接口 用户交流群 : 1081291958
Score basis:Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Repository: posthog
Author: PostHog · Source status: Clear source
🦔 PostHog is an all-in-one developer platform for building successful products.
Score basis:Clear source · High risk signals · Universal
Repository: mcp-for-beginners
Author: microsoft · Source status: Clear source
This open-source curriculum introduces the fundamentals of Model Context Protocol (MCP) through real-world, cross-language examples in .NET, Java, TypeScript, JavaScript, Rust and Python.
Score basis:Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
40 |