Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
Score-basis diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor
Author: hoangsonww · Source status: Clear source
A real-time monitoring dashboard for Claude Code agents, built with SQLite3, Node.js, Express, React, Vite, TailwindCSS, and WebSockets.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
ccNexus
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
tool_calling_api
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
skill-seekers
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | ccNexus | tool_calling_api | skill-seekers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-install decision | |||
Pre-install score | 82 · Manual review | 82 · Manual review | 88 · Evidence missing |
Score basis | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal | Clear source, High execution risk, Claude |
Execution risk | High | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command |
Evidence completeness | 65% | 67% | 71% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | lich0821/ccNexus | Shuyib/tool_calling_api | openclaw/skills |
Category | Dev & Engineering | Dev & Engineering | Dev & Engineering |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & permission signals | |||
Audit signals | No explicit signals | No explicit signals | needs credentials, network access, runs shell, writes files |
Permission hints | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | verify source provenance before install |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Universal | Universal | Claude, Cursor, Windsurf |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 816 | 20 | 0 |
Repository: raptor
Author: gadievron · Source status: Clear source
Raptor turns Claude Code into a general-purpose AI offensive/defensive security agent.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: tokscale
Author: junhoyeo · Source status: Clear source
🛰️ A CLI tool for tracking token usage from OpenCode, Claude Code, 🦞OpenClaw (Clawdbot/Moltbot), Pi, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, AmpCode, Factory Droid, Kimi, and more!
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: ClaudeBar
Author: tddworks · Source status: Clear source
A macOS menu bar application that monitors AI coding assistant usage quotas.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
Repository: splitrail
Author: Piebald-AI · Source status: Clear source
Fast, cross-platform, real-time token usage tracker and cost monitor for Gemini CLI / Claude Code / Codex CLI / Qwen Code / Cline / Roo Code / Kilo Code / GitHub Copilot / OpenCode / Pi Agent / Piebald.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
2026-03-23 |
2026-03-28 |
2026-04-04 |
40 |
40 |
65 |
