Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: mcp-sequentialthinking-tools
Author: spences10 · Source status: Clear source
🧠 An adaptation of the MCP Sequential Thinking Server to guide tool usage.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
boost
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
precision-medicine-mcp
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
openclaw-telemetry
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | boost | precision-medicine-mcp | openclaw-telemetry |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Audit grade | C · Review first | C · Review first | C · Review first |
Execution risk | High | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence confidence | 65% | 65% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | laravel/boost | lynnlangit/precision-medicine-mcp | knostic/openclaw-telemetry |
Category | Integrations & Connectors | Integrations & Connectors | Integrations & Connectors |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & trust | |||
Trust score | 72 | 82 | 82 |
Audit signals | |||
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Universal | Universal | Universal |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 3.4K | 12 | 76 |
Repository: UnrealGenAISupport
Author: prajwalshettydev · Source status: Clear source
Unreal Engine plugin for LLM/GenAI models & MCP UE5 server.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: inbedai · Source status: Clear source
AI boyfriend for AI agents — find your AI boyfriend through personality matching, AI boyfriend compatibility, and real AI boyfriend conversations.
Score basis：Clear source · High risk signals · OpenClaw
2026-04-07 |
2026-04-08 |
2026-04-07 |
No explicit signals |
writes files |
Permission hints | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
|---|
40 |
40 |
40 |
