Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Awesome-Astron-Workflow
FenjuFu/Awesome-Astron-Workflow · Score 82
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
Agrim
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
site-to-md
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
GLM-OCR-SDK
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
Awesome-Astron-Workflow
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | Agrim | site-to-md | GLM-OCR-SDK | Awesome-Astron-Workflow |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | ||||
Audit grade | C · Review first | C · Review first | C · Review first | C · Review first |
Execution risk | High | High | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence confidence | 67% | 67% | 67% | 65% |
| Source & provenance | ||||
Provenance | anjasi212/Agrim | tmaier/site-to-md | openclaw/skills | FenjuFu/Awesome-Astron-Workflow |
Category | Productivity & Docs | Productivity & Docs | Productivity & Docs | Productivity & Docs |
Freshness | ||||
| Risk & trust | ||||
Trust score | 67 | 82 | 85 | 82 |
Audit signals | No explicit signals | needs credentials, runs shell, writes files | ||
| Install & compatibility | ||||
Supported tools | Universal | Universal | OpenClaw | Universal |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed | script-backed | script-backed |
Install friction | ||||
| Community | ||||
Stars | 1 | 8 | 0 | 14 |
2025-06-28 |
2026-04-07 |
2026-04-02 |
2026-03-30 |
No explicit signals |
Permission hints | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | requires binary: python, verify source provenance before install | repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
|---|
40 |
65 |
65 |
40 |
