Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
Agrim
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
convert-plaintext-to-md
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：prompt injection, tool poisoning, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, network without allowlist
Polla Translator For Central Kurdish (ckb)
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | Agrim | convert-plaintext-to-md | Polla Translator For Central Kurdish (ckb) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Audit grade | C · Review first | C · Review first | C · Review first |
Execution risk | High | High | High |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning | prompt injection, tool poisoning, data exfiltration | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, network without allowlist | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence confidence | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | anjasi212/Agrim | github/awesome-copilot | openclaw/skills |
Category | Productivity & Docs | Productivity & Docs | Productivity & Docs |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & trust | |||
Trust score | 67 | 82 | 85 |
Audit signals | No explicit signals | No explicit signals | network access, writes files |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Universal | Claude, Codex, Cursor, Windsurf | Universal |
Install method | script-backed | instruction-only | script-backed |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 1 | 28.9K | 0 |
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: jaredforreal · Source status: Clear source
Trigger when: (1) User wants to extract text, tables, formulas, or structured data from images/PDFs/scanned documents, (2) User mentions "OCR", "文字识别", "文档解析", (3) User has a document (screenshot, scanned page, invoice,
Score basis：Clear source · High risk signals · OpenClaw
Repository: Awesome-Astron-Workflow
Author: FenjuFu · Source status: Clear source
A curated collection of Astron workflow examples and user cases for AI-powered applications, featuring real-world implementations including AI Resume Assistant, Translator, Content Writing, Podcast Generator, and Course
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
2025-06-28 |
2026-04-09 |
2026-03-31 |
Permission hints |
|---|
repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
local skill installation, workspace file updates |
verify source provenance before install |
40 |
60 |
40 |
