dify
Repository: dify
Author: langgenius · Source status: Clear source
Production-ready platform for agentic workflow development.
Score basis:Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Repository: AutoRedTeam-Orchestrator
Author: Coff0xc·Source status: Clear source
Enterprise AI Red Team Platform | 企业级AI红队平台 | 132 MCP Tools | Pure Python Engines | SDK+CLI+MCP | Auto-Download sqlmap/nuclei/ffuf | Production C2 | LLM Enhanced | Docker Sandbox | SARIF CI/CD | 1980 Tests
Score basis:Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Trust level
89 · High trust
Strong recovered source and maintenance signals.
Risk decision
Review required
metadata-only
Install readiness
script-backed · copy-only command
SkillTrust only shows install guidance and copy actions; it never executes installs.
Before you install
Review source, permissions, and execution risk first, then alternatives. Scores prioritize review; they do not replace manual judgment.
Review weakest dimensions and next actions before copying commands.
Evidence or risk signals are incomplete; compare alternatives first.
Audit grade
C · Review first
Execution risk
High
Evidence confidence
65%
SAS-v2.1 radar
SAS-v2.1
Audit grade
C · Review first
Execution risk
High
Top threats
unexpected code execution, data exfiltration
Control gaps
missing license, broad permissions
Evidence confidence
65%
Repository
Coff0xc/AutoRedTeam-Orchestrator
Author
Coff0xc
Community signal
205 stars · 47 forks
Last updated
2026-04-09
Primary source
Coff0xc/AutoRedTeam-Orchestrator
Source status
Clear source
Install method
script-backed
Command & code execution
34Focus: Whether it runs commands or scripts
Next action: Manually confirm command-running skills in an isolated directory.
High-risk action confirmation
38Focus: Whether destructive or external actions require confirmation
Next action: Avoid directly installing high-risk skills without confirmation controls.
Network & data egress
43Focus: Whether it may send data out
Next action: If unsure, restrict network access or allow only known domains.
Supported tools can change install steps; Universal entries need source review.
Explicitly supported
Candidate support (inferred)
Candidate tools are inferred signals, not official compatibility certifications.
git clone https://github.com/Coff0xc/AutoRedTeam-Orchestrator.gitmetadata-only
Review source and permissions before copying install commands.
Evidence or risk signals are incomplete; compare alternatives first.
Focus: Who published it and whether it is traceable
Next action: Review repository, author, and README first; do not install directly when source is pending.
Focus: Whether install steps can be reviewed
Next action: Prefer candidates with install docs and repository evidence.
Focus: Whether tool descriptions may hide instructions
Next action: Read README, rules, and tool descriptions before install.
Focus: What it can access
Next action: Grant only task-required permissions and prefer Ask/manual confirmation.
Focus: Whether it runs commands or scripts
Next action: Manually confirm command-running skills in an isolated directory.
Focus: Whether file reads/writes can escape scope
Next action: Check working directory and file access scope before running.
Focus: Whether it may send data out
Next action: If unsure, restrict network access or allow only known domains.
Focus: Whether it handles tokens, private keys, or agent identity
Next action: Do not provide long-lived tokens or private keys to source-pending skills.
Focus: Whether external content can steer behavior
Next action: For browser/RAG/rules skills, review permissions and confirmation controls first.
Focus: Whether memory or retrieved context can be poisoned
Next action: Try RAG/memory skills in a low-privilege environment first.
Focus: Whether external tools and MCP access are clearly bounded
Next action: Confirm which external tools it will connect to before install, and start with the smallest possible set.
Focus: Whether destructive or external actions require confirmation
Next action: Avoid directly installing high-risk skills without confirmation controls.
Focus: How far impact can spread when something goes wrong
Next action: If unsure, test in an isolated project first.
Focus: Whether actions can be traced
Next action: Prefer candidates with logs or previews.
Focus: Whether it is maintained and reusable
Next action: Check license and maintenance before organizational use.
Strong recovered source and maintenance signals.
Phase 1 only shows installation-aware, source-backed signals. SkillTrust does not execute install scripts for users.
Risk factors
metadata-only
Permission hints
repository clone
Why related: Same task category, Keyword overlap...
Why related: Same task category, Keyword overlap, Similar install method
Repository: pi-mono
Author: badlogic · Source status: Clear source
AI agent toolkit: coding agent CLI, unified LLM API, TUI & web UI libraries, Slack bot, vLLM pods
Score basis:Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Why related: Same task category, Keyword overlap...
Why related: Same task category, Keyword overlap, Similar install method
Repository: ruflo
Author: ruvnet · Source status: Clear source
🌊 The leading agent orchestration platform for Claude.
Score basis:Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Why related: Same task category, Keyword overlap...
Why related: Same task category, Keyword overlap, Similar install method
Repository: nx
Author: nrwl · Source status: Clear source
The Monorepo Platform that amplifies both developers and AI agents.
Score basis:Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Why related: Same task category, Keyword overlap...
Why related: Same task category, Keyword overlap, Similar install method
Repository: openclaw
Author: openclaw · Source status: Clear source
Your own personal AI assistant.
Score basis:Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Why related: Same task category, Keyword overlap...
Why related: Same task category, Keyword overlap, Similar install method
Repository: langchain
Author: langchain-ai · Source status: Clear source
The agent engineering platform
Score basis:Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Why related: Same task category, Keyword overlap...
Why related: Same task category, Keyword overlap, Similar install method
Repository: Github-API-scan
Author: Coff0xc · Source status: Clear source
GitHub 泄露的 API 密钥扫描器。支持 OpenAI/Claude/Gemini/Azure。异步验证 + GPT-4 探测 + 余额检测。丰富的 TUI 控制面板。
Score basis:Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Repository: LLM-Security-Assessment-Framework
Author: Coff0xc · Source status: Clear source
FORGEDAN — An Evolutionary Framework for LLM Security Assessment | 6 Attack Methods | 18 Model Adapters | Vue 3 Dashboard | Web Security Scanning
Score basis:Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal