PaddleOCR
Repository: PaddleOCR
Author: PaddlePaddle · Source status: Clear source
Turn any PDF or image document into structured data for your AI.
Score basis:Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
Repository: openclaw-mcp-bridge
Author: AIWerk·Source status: Clear source
OpenClaw MCP Client Plugin - bridges MCP servers into OpenClaw via registerTool
Score basis:Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
Pre-install score
65 · Manual review
One primary score for ranking and pre-install decisions; Evidence completeness 65%.
Risk decision
Review required
metadata-only
Install readiness
script-backed · copy-only command
SkillTrust only shows install guidance and copy actions; it never executes installs.
Before you install
Review source, permissions, and execution risk first, then alternatives. Scores prioritize review; they do not replace manual judgment.
Install guidance
This area handles the execution step: review explicit or inferred tool fit, then decide whether to copy commands.
Explicitly supported
Candidate support (inferred)
Candidate tools are inferred signals, not official compatibility certifications.
Universal
Shown with the common install pattern for this tool.
git clone https://github.com/AIWerk/openclaw-mcp-bridge.gitReview source and permissions first. If no explicit command is available, start from the repository guidance.
Current risk hints: metadata-only
Audit main stage
This stage turns 15 audit dimensions into one pre-install score; the constellation only explains the gaps instead of becoming a second score.
The purpose is visible, but source, permissions, or install evidence needs checking.
Current advice
Review before install
Review source, permissions, and execution details before copying commands.
Execution profile
High
Check command, file-write, and network behavior first.
Evidence completeness
65%
This shows how much public evidence supports the score; it is not a safety certification.
Start with the overall shape and the weakest three items, then use the list below for full labels, scores, and actions.
Start here
Read the weakest three first, then move into the full 15-item list.
Full 15-dimension list
The default view starts from the lowest scores; switch to risk-first when you want severity before score.
Repository
AIWerk/openclaw-mcp-bridge
Author
AIWerk
Community signal
11 stars · 3 forks
Favorites
0
Last updated
2026-04-01
Primary source
AIWerk/openclaw-mcp-bridge
Source status
Clear source
Install method
script-backed
Related: Same task category...
Why related: Same task category, Keyword overlap, Similar install method
Repository: openclaw
Author: openclaw · Source status: Clear source
Your own personal AI assistant.
Score basis:Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
Related: Same task category...
Why related: Same task category, Keyword overlap, Similar install method
Repository: gemini-cli
Author: google-gemini · Source status: Clear source
An open-source AI agent that brings the power of Gemini directly into your terminal.
Score basis:Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
Related: Same task category...
Why related: Same task category, Keyword overlap, Similar install method
Repository: MinerU
Author: opendatalab · Source status: Clear source
Transforms complex documents like PDFs into LLM-ready markdown/JSON for your Agentic workflows.
Score basis:Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
Related: Same task category...
Why related: Same task category, Keyword overlap, Similar install method
Repository: mcp-server-cal
Author: AIWerk · Source status: Clear source
Cal.com scheduling MCP server - manage bookings, event types, and availability
Score basis:Clear source · High execution risk · Claude · Evidence completeness 63%
Repository: mcp-server-imap
Author: AIWerk · Source status: Clear source
IMAP/SMTP MCP server for listing, reading, searching and sending email
Score basis:Clear source · High execution risk · Claude · Evidence completeness 65%