Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
vscode-unify-chat-provider
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
mcp-for-beginners
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
ClaudeBar
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | vscode-unify-chat-provider | mcp-for-beginners | ClaudeBar |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Evidence confidence | 65% | 67% | 65% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | smallmain/vscode-unify-chat-provider | microsoft/mcp-for-beginners | tddworks/ClaudeBar |
Freshness | 2026-03-30 | 2026-04-08 | 2026-04-01 |
| Risk & trust | |||
Trust score | 79 | 85 | 82 |
| Community | |||
Stars | 333 | 15.8K | 893 |
Repository: raptor
Author: gadievron · Source status: Clear source
Raptor turns Claude Code into a general-purpose AI offensive/defensive security agent.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Repository: entroly
Author: juyterman1000 · Source status: Clear source
Entroly helps AI coding tools like Cursor, Copilot, and Claude Code use the right context from your entire codebase—improving output quality while reducing token usage.
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Repository: tool_calling_api
Author: Shuyib · Source status: Clear source
This project demonstrates function-calling with Python and Ollama, utilizing the Africa's Talking API to send airtime and messages to phone numbers using natural language prompts.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
