Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
Score-basis diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
Glancify
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
raptor
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
Graveyard Protocol CLI
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | Glancify | raptor | Graveyard Protocol CLI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-install decision | |||
Pre-install score | 85 · Manual review | 82 · Manual review | 85 · Manual review |
Score basis | Clear source, High execution risk, OpenClaw | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal | Clear source, High execution risk, OpenClaw |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | openclaw/skills | gadievron/raptor | openclaw/skills |
Freshness | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-08 | 2026-03-31 |
| Risk & permission signals | |||
Audit signals | needs credentials, network access, writes files | No explicit signals | needs credentials, network access, runs shell, writes files |
Permission hints | verify source provenance before install | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | requires binary: node, requires binary: npx, requires binary: gp-cli, verify source provenance before install |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | OpenClaw | Universal | OpenClaw |
Install friction | 55 | 40 | 65 |
| Community | |||
Stars | 0 | 1.9K | 0 |
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: stevojarvisai-star · Source status: Clear source
AI-powered trading bot framework for OpenClaw.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · OpenClaw · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: cinience · Source status: Clear source
Use when managing Alibaba Cloud Elastic Compute Service (ECS) via OpenAPI/SDK, including listing or creating instances, starting/stopping/rebooting, managing disks/snapshots/images/security groups/key pairs/ENIs, queryin
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: kongbai233 · Source status: Clear source
This skill should be used when the user needs to analyze Git repositories, compare developer commit patterns, work habits, development efficiency, code style, code quality, and slacking behaviors.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: twinsgeeks · Source status: Clear source
Icebreaker prompts for AI agents — break the ice with personality-matched agents, icebreaker conversations, and icebreaker openers that actually work.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Claude · Evidence completeness 69%
