Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
Score-basis diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: knowledge-work-plugins
Author: anthropics · Source status: Clear source
Generate tailored sales assets (landing pages, decks, one-pagers, workflow demos) from your deal context.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Claude · Evidence completeness 67%
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
TidGi-Desktop
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
qdrant-loader
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
1Panel
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | TidGi-Desktop | qdrant-loader | 1Panel |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-install decision | |||
Pre-install score | 81 · Manual review | 81 · Manual review | 92 · Manual review |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Evidence completeness | 67% | 67% | 65% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | tiddly-gittly/TidGi-Desktop | martin-papy/qdrant-loader | 1Panel-dev/1Panel |
Category | Knowledge & RAG | Knowledge & RAG | Agent & Tools |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & permission signals | |||
Audit signals | network access | writes files | metadata-only |
Permission hints | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | repository clone |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Install friction | 40 | 40 | 75 |
| Community | |||
Stars | 2K | 37 | 35K |
Repository: OpenViking
Author: volcengine · Source status: Clear source
OpenViking is an open-source context database designed specifically for AI Agents(such as openclaw).
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 69%
Repository: Buddy
Author: is-leeroy-jenkins · Source status: Clear source
An AI for federal financial management designed to support Financial Analysts, Managers, and Policy Professionals.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: minerva-care · Source status: Clear source
Interact with Lidarr (music/album manager) via its REST API.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: minerva-care · Source status: Clear source
Interact with Sonarr (TV show manager) via its REST API.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
2026-04-07 |
2026-04-06 |
2026-04-14 |
