Agentic Ai Engineering
Repository: agentic-ai-engineering
Author: agenticloops-ai · Source status: Clear source
Hands-on tutorials for building AI agents from scratch.
Score basis:Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
skills-vote
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps:missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
DemoGPT
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution
Control gaps:missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
claude-pace-maker
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution
Control gaps:missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | skills-vote | DemoGPT | claude-pace-maker |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution | prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution |
Evidence confidence | 65% | 67% | 68% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | MemTensor/skills-vote | melih-unsal/DemoGPT | LightspeedDMS/claude-pace-maker |
Freshness | 2026-04-08 | 2026-04-01 | 2026-04-06 |
| Risk & trust | |||
Trust score | 72 | 82 | 82 |
Audit signals | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 17 | 1.9K | 4 |
Repository: entroly
Author: juyterman1000 · Source status: Clear source
Entroly helps AI coding tools like Cursor, Copilot, and Claude Code use the right context from your entire codebase—improving output quality while reducing token usage.
Score basis:Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Repository: NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super
Author: cobusgreyling · Source status: Clear source
Controllable reasoning demos for NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (120B/12B MoE) — chat UI, CLI, API server, tool calling, budget sweep, and adaptive routing Topics: gradio, llm, mixture-of-experts, moe, nemotron, nim, nvidia, re
Score basis:Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Repository: tool_calling_api
Author: Shuyib · Source status: Clear source
This project demonstrates function-calling with Python and Ollama, utilizing the Africa's Talking API to send airtime and messages to phone numbers using natural language prompts.
Score basis:Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
No explicit signals |
writes files |