Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
Score-basis diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: hoyaryyj · Source status: Clear source
Create and edit Obsidian Flavored Markdown with wikilinks, embeds, callouts, properties, and other Obsidian-specific syntax.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
PDFMathTranslate
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
Commitment Ready. 承诺。Compromiso.
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
generate-custom-instructions-from-codebase
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, network without allowlist
| Dimension | PDFMathTranslate | Commitment Ready. 承诺。Compromiso. | generate-custom-instructions-from-codebase |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-install decision | |||
Pre-install score | 82 · Manual review | 85 · Manual review | 82 · Manual review |
Score basis | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal | Clear source, High execution risk, Claude | Clear source, High execution risk, Claude |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, network without allowlist |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Network, Command |
Evidence completeness | 65% | 67% | 65% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | PDFMathTranslate/PDFMathTranslate | openclaw/skills | github/awesome-copilot |
Category | Productivity & Docs | Design & Content | Productivity & Docs |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & permission signals | |||
Audit signals | No explicit signals | needs credentials, network access, runs shell, writes files | No explicit signals |
Permission hints | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | verify source provenance before install | local skill installation, workspace file updates |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Universal | Claude, OpenClaw | Claude, Codex, Cursor, Windsurf |
Install method | script-backed | script-backed | instruction-only |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 32.8K | 0 | 28.9K |
Repository: awesome-copilot
Author: github · Source status: Clear source
Scaffold a complete Power Apps Code App project with PAC CLI setup, SDK integration, and connector configuration
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Claude · Evidence completeness 65%
2026-04-06 |
2026-04-01 |
2026-04-09 |
40 |
65 |
60 |
