Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
Score-basis diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
openclaw-optimize
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
PaddleOCR
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
ruflo
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | openclaw-optimize | PaddleOCR | ruflo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-install decision | |||
Pre-install score | 63 · Manual review | 66 · Manual review | 66 · Manual review |
Score basis | Clear source, High execution risk, OpenClaw | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning |
Evidence completeness | 67% | 65% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | openclaw/skills | PaddlePaddle/PaddleOCR | ruvnet/ruflo |
Category | Operations & Infra | Agent & Tools | Agent & Tools |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & permission signals | |||
Audit signals | network access, runs shell, writes files | metadata-only | metadata-only |
Permission hints | verify source provenance before install | repository clone | repository clone |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | OpenClaw | Universal | Universal |
Install friction | 50 | 75 | 75 |
| Community | |||
Stars | 0 | 75.5K | 31.7K |
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: jpengcheng523-netizen · Source status: Clear source
Provides monitoring and alerting for agent abnormal behavior metrics with Prometheus and Grafana support, including P99 latency, error rates, anomaly detection, and custom alert rules.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: stevojarvisai-star · Source status: Clear source
AI-powered trading bot framework for OpenClaw.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · OpenClaw · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: alexanderliteplo · Source status: Clear source
Hire humans for physical-world tasks via RentAHuman.ai.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · OpenClaw · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: robin-marv · Source status: Clear source
Snapshot and back up OpenClaw brain files (AGENTS.md, SOUL.md, MEMORY.md, memory/, etc.) to an offsite git repository — like a lobster shedding its shell, leaving behind a perfect copy before growing.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · OpenClaw · Evidence completeness 69%
2026-03-29 |
2026-04-14 |
2026-04-11 |
