Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: eternal0404 · Source status: Clear source
The all-in-one master skill — unified interface for every capability domain.
Score basis：Clear source · High risk signals · Claude
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
OpenPaperGraph
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
skill-seekers
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
predictive-scaler
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist
| Dimension | OpenPaperGraph | skill-seekers | predictive-scaler |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Audit grade | C · Review first | D · Limited evidence | C · Review first |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence confidence | 67% | 71% | 63% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Category | Data & Analytics | Dev & Engineering | Data & Analytics |
Freshness | 2026-03-25 | 2026-04-04 | 2026-03-25 |
| Risk & trust | |||
Trust score | 84 | 88 | 85 |
Audit signals | needs credentials, network access, runs shell, writes files | needs credentials, network access, runs shell, writes files | network access |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Claude, Codex, OpenClaw | Claude, Cursor, Windsurf | Universal |
Install friction | 65 | 65 | 40 |
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: cinience · Source status: Clear source
Use when working with OpenSearch vector search edition via the Python SDK (ha3engine) to push documents and run HA/SQL searches.
Score basis：Clear source · High risk signals · Claude
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: lanyasheng · Source status: Clear source
当需要为目标 skill 生成改进候选、把上次失败信息注入下一轮生成、或分析历史记忆模式来避免重复失败时使用。支持 --trace 注入失败上下文。不用于打分（用 improvement-discriminator）或评估（用 improvement-learner）。
Score basis：Clear source · High risk signals · OpenClaw
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: lbtylb · Source status: Clear source
Advanced suite for creating, editing, and analyzing Microsoft Office documents (Word, Excel, PowerPoint).
Score basis：Clear source · High risk signals · OpenClaw
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: neroagent · Source status: Clear source
Core memory resilience layer: WAL (Write-Ahead Log), Working Buffer, and three-layer memory integration.
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Claude
