Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
Score-basis diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: rox
Author: BeWelcome · Source status: Clear source
:earth_africa: BeWelcome lets you share a place to stay, connect with travellers, meet up and find accommodation on your journey.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
OpenDsStar
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
Promet
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
mcp-for-beginners
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | OpenDsStar | Promet | mcp-for-beginners |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-install decision | |||
Pre-install score | 79 · Manual review | 82 · Manual review | 85 · Manual review |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning |
Evidence completeness | 65% | 67% | 67% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | IBM/OpenDsStar | Tripadh/Promet | microsoft/mcp-for-beginners |
Freshness | 2026-04-05 | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-08 |
| Risk & permission signals | |||
Audit signals | runs shell, writes files | No explicit signals | No explicit signals |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Install friction | 50 | 40 | 40 |
| Community | |||
Stars | 15 | 4 | 15.8K |
Repository: ultimate-prompt-engineering-playbook
Author: amerob · Source status: Clear source
A collection of 114 notebooks covering modern prompt engineering techniques.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: cloud-pak-deployer
Author: IBM · Source status: Clear source
Configuration-based installation of OpenShift and Cloud Pak for Data/Integration/Watson AIOps/Business Automation on various private and public cloud infrastructure providers.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
