Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
Score-basis diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: twinsgeeks · Source status: Clear source
Icebreaker prompts for AI agents — break the ice with personality-matched agents, icebreaker conversations, and icebreaker openers that actually work.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Claude · Evidence completeness 69%
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
Openclaw Smart Search
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
App Connectors
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
Aliyun Qwen Rerank
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps：missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist
| Dimension | Openclaw Smart Search | App Connectors | Aliyun Qwen Rerank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-install decision | |||
Pre-install score | 85 · Evidence missing | 85 · Manual review | 85 · Manual review |
Score basis | Clear source, High execution risk, OpenClaw | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence completeness | 69% | 65% | 65% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Category | Integrations & Connectors | Integrations & Connectors | Knowledge & RAG |
Freshness | 2026-03-26 | 2026-03-31 | 2026-04-02 |
| Risk & permission signals | |||
Audit signals | needs credentials, network access, runs shell, writes files | needs credentials, network access, runs shell | network access, runs shell |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | OpenClaw | Universal | Universal |
Install friction | 65 | 65 | 50 |
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: neroagent · Source status: Clear source
Automated audit and fix for OpenClaw agent harnesses.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Claude · Evidence completeness 69%
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: spzwin · Source status: Clear source
NoteX 技能路由网关索引（access-token 鉴权，由 cms-auth-skills 统一提供），覆盖内容生产（PPT/视频/音频/报告/脑图/测验/闪卡/信息图）、运营数据问答与洞察、笔记本管理（列表/统计/创建/追加来源）、来源索引与详情定位、首页登录链接生成。
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: cinience · Source status: Clear source
Use when managing Alibaba Cloud RDS Supabase (RDS AI Service 2025-05-07) via OpenAPI, including creating, starting/stopping/restarting instances, resetting passwords, querying endpoints/auth/storage, configuring auth/RAG
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 69%
