Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: langfuse
Author: langfuse · Source status: Clear source
🪢 Open source LLM engineering platform: LLM Observability, metrics, evals, prompt management, playground, datasets.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
Observal
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
mcp-shark
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
httptap
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | Observal | mcp-shark | httptap |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Evidence confidence | 65% | 67% | 65% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | BlazeUp-AI/Observal | mcp-shark/mcp-shark | ozeranskii/httptap |
Freshness | 2026-04-05 | 2026-04-05 | 2026-04-06 |
| Risk & trust | |||
Audit signals | No explicit signals | network access | network access |
| Community | |||
Stars | 136 | 160 | 486 |
Repository: openclaw-office
Author: WW-AI-Lab · Source status: Clear source
OpenClaw Office is the visual monitoring and management frontend for the OpenClaw Multi-Agent system.
Score basis：Clear source · High risk signals · Universal
Repository: MCP-PostgreSQL-Ops
Author: call518 · Source status: Clear source
🔍Professional MCP server for PostgreSQL operations & monitoring: 30+ extension-independent tools for performance analysis, table bloat detection, autovacuum monitoring, schema introspection, and database management.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
