Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
n8n-install
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
oss-llmops-stack
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
docker-selenium
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | n8n-install | oss-llmops-stack | docker-selenium |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning | prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | kossakovsky/n8n-install | langfuse/oss-llmops-stack | SeleniumHQ/docker-selenium |
Category | Operations & Infra | Automation & Workflows | Operations & Infra |
Freshness | 2026-03-29 | 2025-02-16 | 2026-04-05 |
| Risk & trust | |||
Trust score | 79 | 83 | 79 |
Audit signals | network access, runs shell | metadata-only | No explicit signals |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Install friction | 50 | 75 | 40 |
| Community | |||
Stars | 795 | 136 | 8.6K |
Repository: AstrBot
Author: AstrBotDevs · Source status: Clear source
Agentic IM Chatbot infrastructure that integrates lots of IM platforms, LLMs, plugins and AI feature, and can be your openclaw alternative.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Repository: GenericAgent
Author: lsdefine · Source status: Clear source
Self-evolving agent: grows skill tree from 3.3K-line seed, achieving full system control with 6x less token consumption Topics: ai-agent, automation, autonomous-agent, browser-automation, claude, computer-control, deskto
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Repository: coolify-mcp
Author: StuMason · Source status: Clear source
MCP server for Coolify — 38 optimized tools for managing self-hosted PaaS through AI assistants Topics: ai, claude, coolify, deployment, devops, infrastructure, mcp, model-context-protocol, paas, self-hosted, typescript.
Score basis：Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Permission hints |
|---|
repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
repository clone |
repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
