Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
Score-basis diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
MCP-PostgreSQL-Ops
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
anything-llm
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
Observal
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | MCP-PostgreSQL-Ops | anything-llm | Observal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-install decision | |||
Pre-install score | 67 · Manual review | 66 · Manual review | 67 · Manual review |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | call518/MCP-PostgreSQL-Ops | Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm | BlazeUp-AI/Observal |
Category | Operations & Infra | Automation & Workflows | Operations & Infra |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & permission signals | |||
Audit signals | No explicit signals | metadata-only | No explicit signals |
Permission hints | repository clone, local runtime dependencies | repository clone | repository clone, local runtime dependencies |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Install friction | 40 | 75 | 40 |
| Community | |||
Stars | 145 | 58.3K | 136 |
Repository: openclaw-office
Author: WW-AI-Lab · Source status: Clear source
OpenClaw Office is the visual monitoring and management frontend for the OpenClaw Multi-Agent system.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
Repository: mcp-shark
Author: mcp-shark · Source status: Clear source
Wireshark-like forensic analysis for Model Context Protocol communications Capture, inspect, and investigate all HTTP requests and responses between your IDE and MCP servers Topics: electron, forensic-analysis, forensic
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: jpengcheng523-netizen · Source status: Clear source
Provides monitoring and alerting for agent abnormal behavior metrics with Prometheus and Grafana support, including P99 latency, error rates, anomaly detection, and custom alert rules.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
Repository: mcpcan
Author: Kymo-MCP · Source status: Clear source
MCPCAN is a centralized management platform for MCP services.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 67%
2026-04-01 |
2026-04-14 |
2026-04-05 |
