Claudebar
Repository: ClaudeBar
Author: tddworks · Source status: Clear source
A macOS menu bar application that monitors AI coding assistant usage quotas.
Score basis:Clear source · Low risk signals · Universal
Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
koder
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning
Control gaps:missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
ccNexus
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps:missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
brain-bed
Execution risk:High
Threat tags:unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps:missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | koder | ccNexus | brain-bed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, memory context poisoning | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Evidence confidence | 67% | 65% | 65% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | feiskyer/koder | lich0821/ccNexus | bbangjooo/brain-bed |
Freshness | 2026-03-26 | 2026-03-23 | 2026-04-05 |
| Risk & trust | |||
Trust score | 76 | 82 | 82 |
| Community | |||
Stars | 88 | 816 | 3 |
Repository: entroly
Author: juyterman1000 · Source status: Clear source
Entroly helps AI coding tools like Cursor, Copilot, and Claude Code use the right context from your entire codebase—improving output quality while reducing token usage.
Score basis:Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Repository: cc-statistics
Author: androidZzT · Source status: Clear source
AI Coding stats dashboard — track costs, tokens, and efficiency across Claude Code / Gemini CLI / Codex / Cursor Topics: ai-coding, claude-code, cli, cost-estimation, developer-tools, gemini-cli, macos-app, python, swift
Score basis:Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal