Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
Score-basis diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: eternal0404 · Source status: Clear source
The all-in-one master skill — unified interface for every capability domain.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Claude · Evidence completeness 67%
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
Improvement Generator
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
security-ownership-map
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, network without allowlist
accessibility-scanner
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | Improvement Generator | security-ownership-map | accessibility-scanner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-install decision | |||
Pre-install score | 85 · Manual review | 82 · Manual review | 90 · Manual review |
Score basis | Clear source, High execution risk, OpenClaw | Clear source, High execution risk, Claude | Clear source, High execution risk, Universal |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, broad permissions, network without allowlist | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence completeness | 67% | 67% | 65% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | openclaw/skills | openai/skills/tree/main/skills/.curated/security-ownership-map | github/accessibility-scanner |
Category | Data & Analytics | Data & Analytics | Agent & Tools |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & permission signals | |||
Audit signals | needs credentials, network access, runs shell | writes files | metadata-only |
Permission hints | verify source provenance before install | registry access, remote metadata pull, runtime dependencies may be required | repository clone |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | OpenClaw | Claude, Codex, Cursor, Universal | Universal |
Install method | script-backed | registry-install | script-backed |
Install friction | |||
| Community | |||
Stars | 0 | 7.3K | 260 |
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: zaferliu · Source status: Clear source
信息调研报告自动化工作流。一键完成：多源搜索 → 深度挖掘 → 政府风格 DOCX 报告生成 → 邮件发送。
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · OpenClaw · Evidence completeness 71%
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: kongbai233 · Source status: Clear source
Data visualization tool producing SVG charts.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: jpengcheng523-netizen · Source status: Clear source
Analyze resource usage patterns and predict future scaling needs using trend analysis and forecasting methods for capacity planning and auto-scaling decisions.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 63%
2026-04-07 |
2026-02-11 |
2026-04-14 |
65 |
50 |
75 |
