Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: tenequm · Source status: Clear source
Convert documentation, GitHub repos, PDFs, codebases, videos, and more into structured AI skills using the skill-seekers CLI.
Score basis：Clear source · High risk signals · Claude
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
Graveyard Protocol CLI
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
checkout-agent
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist
Superpowers Core Pipeline (袁文同优化版)
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | Graveyard Protocol CLI | checkout-agent | Superpowers Core Pipeline (袁文同优化版) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Control gaps | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails | missing license, shell without guardrails, network without allowlist | missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence confidence | 67% | 65% | 65% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Category | Dev & Engineering | Web & Automation | Dev & Engineering |
Freshness | 2026-03-31 | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| Risk & trust | |||
Audit signals | needs credentials, network access, runs shell, writes files | needs credentials, network access | network access, runs shell, writes files |
Permission hints | requires binary: node, requires binary: npx, requires binary: gp-cli, verify source provenance before install | verify source provenance before install | requires binary: git, verify source provenance before install |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Install friction | 65 | 55 | 50 |
Repository: openclaw/skills
Author: kongbai233 · Source status: Clear source
This skill should be used when the user needs to analyze Git repositories, compare developer commit patterns, work habits, development efficiency, code style, code quality, and slacking behaviors.
Score basis：Clear source · High risk signals · Universal
