Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Repository: lobehub
Author: lobehub · Source status: Clear source
The ultimate space for work and life — to find, build, and collaborate with agent teammates that grow with you.
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
BotMa
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
agency-agents
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
ansible
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | BotMa | agency-agents | ansible |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | prompt injection, tool poisoning, unexpected code execution | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Evidence confidence | 65% | 67% | 65% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | tonyngugi997/BotMa | msitarzewski/agency-agents | ansible/ansible |
Freshness | 2026-04-14 | 2026-04-12 | 2026-04-14 |
| Risk & trust | |||
Trust score | 45 | 92 | 92 |
| Community | |||
Stars | 0 | 79.6K | 68.4K |
Repository: cline
Author: cline · Source status: Clear source
Autonomous coding agent right in your IDE, capable of creating/editing files, executing commands, using the browser, and more with your permission every step of the way.
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
