Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
Score-basis diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Pre-install score, evidence completeness, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
MinerU
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
opencode
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
Ultramemory
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | MinerU | opencode | Ultramemory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-install decision | |||
Pre-install score | 66 · Manual review | 66 · Manual review | 58 · Evidence missing |
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command |
Evidence completeness | 65% | 65% | 69% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | opendatalab/MinerU | anomalyco/opencode | openclaw/skills |
Category | Agent & Tools | Agent & Tools | Knowledge & RAG |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & permission signals | |||
Audit signals | metadata-only | metadata-only | needs credentials, network access, runs shell, writes files |
Permission hints | repository clone | repository clone | verify source provenance before install |
| Install & compatibility | |||
Install friction | 75 | 75 | 65 |
| Community | |||
Stars | 59.7K | 142.8K | 0 |
Repository: dify
Author: langgenius · Source status: Clear source
Production-ready platform for agentic workflow development.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
Repository: gemini-cli
Author: google-gemini · Source status: Clear source
An open-source AI agent that brings the power of Gemini directly into your terminal.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
Repository: awesome-design-md
Author: VoltAgent · Source status: Clear source
A collection of DESIGN.md files inspired by popular brand design systems.
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
Repository: mindsdb
Author: mindsdb · Source status: Clear source
Query Engine for AI Analytics: Build self-reasoning agents across all your live data
Score basis：Clear source · High execution risk · Universal · Evidence completeness 65%
2026-04-14 |
2026-04-14 |
2026-03-30 |
