khoj
Repository: khoj
Author: khoj-ai · Source status: Clear source
Score 92Clear source
Manual reviewYour AI second brain.
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Author unclaimed
Universal
34.1K
Compare skills
Pick 2–4 skills and compare what really matters: fit, risk, install effort, and community signal.
Comparison matrix
Highlights show current best; tooltip explains diff/best rules.
SAS-v2.1 diff rules / risk tag notes
Start with the matrix. Open this section when you need to understand audit grades, top threats, control gaps, and best-value highlights.
Suggested baseline
Search to add skills, or paste 2–4 comma-separated slugs.
How differences are detected
A row is marked different when selected skills have distinct values. Only-differences mode hides rows that are identical.
How best values are highlighted
Audit score, evidence confidence, trust score, and community signal prefer higher values; execution risk and install friction prefer lower values.
How to read risk tags
Risk tags come from SAS-v2.1 public-evidence signals and point to command, network, secret, context, or supply-chain items to review before install.
Selected audit signals
openclaw
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
info-research-report
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
1Panel
Execution risk：High
Threat tags：unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap
Control gaps：missing license, broad permissions, shell without guardrails
| Dimension | openclaw | info-research-report | 1Panel |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAS-v2.1 pre-install audit | |||
Threat tags | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap | unexpected code execution, identity privilege abuse, data exfiltration | unexpected code execution, data exfiltration, human approval gap |
Permission summary | Permission review, Network, Command | Permission review, Network, Secrets, Command | Permission review, Network, Command |
Evidence confidence | 65% | 71% | 65% |
| Source & provenance | |||
Provenance | openclaw/openclaw | openclaw/skills | 1Panel-dev/1Panel |
Category | Agent & Tools | Data & Analytics | Agent & Tools |
Freshness | |||
| Risk & trust | |||
Trust score | 92 | 85 | 92 |
Audit signals | |||
| Install & compatibility | |||
Supported tools | Universal | OpenClaw | Universal |
Install friction | 75 | 65 | 75 |
| Community | |||
Stars | 356.8K | 0 | 35K |
Repository: zeroclaw
Author: zeroclaw-labs · Source status: Clear source
Fast, small, and fully autonomous AI personal assistant infrastructure, ANY OS, ANY PLATFORM — deploy anywhere, swap anything 🦀
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
Repository: cline
Author: cline · Source status: Clear source
Autonomous coding agent right in your IDE, capable of creating/editing files, executing commands, using the browser, and more with your permission every step of the way.
Score basis：Clear source · Risk needs review · Universal
2026-04-14 |
2026-04-04 |
2026-04-14 |
needs credentials, network access, runs shell, writes files |
metadata-only |
Permission hints | repository clone | verify source provenance before install | repository clone |
|---|